
Here are your questions from the article today 9/13.
Please answer all questions and all parts of questions on a separate sheet or log in with a google account and comment on the blog. Repsonses due by Thursday 9/15 @10pm.
1. Define: Molotov cocktail, counterterrorism
2. “Because of the widespread distribution, and because of past controversies like a 2009 report on right-wing extremism that irked Congress and veterans, the reports are typically stripped of sensitive detail.” This refers to a Homeland Security memo arguing that returning veterans, and people angry with government in difficult economic times, might take up terrorism. Would this have been more useful to law enforcement than the other examples in the article?
3. Why do local officials find the information that Homeland Security sends to be useless? What kind of information would be useful to stopping terrorists?
4. What reason would a Homeland Security agent have for sending a useless memo? What would be the potential consequences, to the agent or the Department, of not sending the memo?
5. What reason would a Homeland Security agent have for not sending a useless memo? What are the potential consequences, to the agent, if he sends the memo?
6. How could the Homeland Security Department know what information will be useful to local governments and what information will be useless?
7. Is it possible for one agency to know, ahead of time, what information another agency will need to prevent an attack? Why or why not?
8. Before a terrorist attack happens, how well do you think an agency will know what information may prove crucial to preventing the attack? How well do we know this after the attack happens?
2. “Because of the widespread distribution, and because of past controversies like a 2009 report on right-wing extremism that irked Congress and veterans, the reports are typically stripped of sensitive detail.” This refers to a Homeland Security memo arguing that returning veterans, and people angry with government in difficult economic times, might take up terrorism. Would this have been more useful to law enforcement than the other examples in the article?
3. Why do local officials find the information that Homeland Security sends to be useless? What kind of information would be useful to stopping terrorists?
4. What reason would a Homeland Security agent have for sending a useless memo? What would be the potential consequences, to the agent or the Department, of not sending the memo?
5. What reason would a Homeland Security agent have for not sending a useless memo? What are the potential consequences, to the agent, if he sends the memo?
6. How could the Homeland Security Department know what information will be useful to local governments and what information will be useless?
7. Is it possible for one agency to know, ahead of time, what information another agency will need to prevent an attack? Why or why not?
8. Before a terrorist attack happens, how well do you think an agency will know what information may prove crucial to preventing the attack? How well do we know this after the attack happens?


